Jan 11 2007

Cisco: How To Do It Right

We’d praised Cisco for adopting blogs a few months ago, but I don’t think any of us suspected just how great a job they’d do of understanding the medium and really embracing it.

While most of us were busy being Apple fanboys after the announcement of the iPhone (Macworld takes place down the street from Six Apart’s offices, so it’s quite possible that they put something in the drinking water), there were only a few mentions of the fact that Cisco owns the name. Then, word leaked out that a lawsuit was pending, and most of us would expect some boring one-sentence platitudes to get leaked out through News.com over the next few months as the lawsuit dragged on.

But Cisco’s made a really surprising, and very smart move: They’ve posted an honest and intelligent update on their blog, outlining their reasons for the suit and explaining their very reasonable position:

I was surprised and disappointed when Apple decided to go ahead and announce their new product with our trademarked name without reaching an agreement. It was essentially the equivalent of “we’re too busy.” Despite being very close to an agreement, we had no substantive communication from Apple after 8pm Monday, including after their launch, when we made clear we expected closure. What were the issues at the table that kept us from an agreement? Was it money? No. Was it a royalty on every Apple phone? No. Was it an exchange for Cisco products or services? No. Fundamentally we wanted an open approach. We hoped our products could interoperate in the future. In our view, the network provides the basis to make this happen—it provides the foundation of innovation that allows converged devices to deliver the services that consumers want. Our goal was to take that to the next level by facilitating collaboration with Apple. And we wanted to make sure to differentiate the brands in a way that could work for both companies and not confuse people, since our products combine both web access and voice telephony. That’s it. Openness and clarity.

Mark Chandler, Cisco’s SVP and General Counsel, speaks in the first person with a matter-of-fact tone of voice, and it’s enough to overcome the skepticism of even the most diehard fanboy. Impressive work, and it really shows the impact a couple of Movable Type-powered blogs can have on the way a company communicates with its community.

Categories

, ,

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Cisco: How To Do It Right.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.movabletype.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb-nospam.cgi/75

2 Comments

I was impressed by that posting too. It's signed by the company's General Counsel, no less (although I wonder whether it's actually a group-produced document).

The text stays factual, focusing on observable history, talking about the company's overall goals rather than details.

... and wow, it drew a *ton* of comments overnight... I know Scoble linked to it Thu PM PST, but the traffic seems heavy... ah, yes, that post got Slashdotted, no wonder it drew so many comments. I wonder if Cisco Legal is moderating the comments that they're now publishing on their domain.... ;-)

One other observation on this subject is that the only word I've heard on Apple's device has been from Jobs and Schiller themselves, and the reporters they've personally sat down with. No one else from Apple (that I've managed to find) has any perspective, any presence.

On launch day iPhone drew a phenomenal amount of attention, as people responded directly to the manipulation. But the last few days the topic seems to be attracting increasing numbers of negative comments, as people responded to the realization of how they were manipulated. Let's see how this one goes....

jd/adobe

Indeed, very interesting to get such an (almost) person point-of-view.
Surprizing to learn that they have owned the name for many years, still Apple pushed ahead with launching their phone with a name they don`t own. (One might, of course, argue, that the notion of putting an i in front of whatever is a de-facto Apple thing. But reality is that Cisco is the legal owner of the name.)

Leave a comment